In the novel, the thing that I noticed was the pictures; that correlated to the texts, the structure; that made it unique because it was like an online dictionary, and the order of the texts talking about the past, present, and then future time. I found that the pictures that correlated to the texts being talked about were very interesting. Since pictures can be understood, and analyzed for a deeper meaning, having the pictures with the texts created a better understanding of the change in human behaviors and technology. Sometimes I would get confused by what the pictures represented, along with some of the term and definition wording. Granted, I think the concept of elaborating terms with the definition was very unique, it’s just that sometimes I had to reread the passage to fully understand what the author is trying to explain.
The thing that really stood out for me that I agree with in the novel, was the average person’s IQ. Since technology has advanced, people have advanced as well because of the easy access to education. This statement also opened mind by realizing that we think we are dumb, yet sometimes we can be smarter than other generations. It’s just that everyone is used to having the easy access to knowledge that it’s considered average to have a higher level of thinking. Furthermore, I didn’t really have any disagreements with what the novel was portraying. I thought it had a unique way of explaining details to the reader.
Word Count: 250
Social media apps are looking into your personal life.
Next thing you know, you’re personal life
Is being sold
Loading…
Without you knowing it.
Tristan Ikeda 4B Hendricks
Tristan Ikeda 4B Hendricks
Overall, your analysis about the book was very detailed; it referenced a lot about what you thought about the book, which emphasized the validity of how well the book impacted you as a reader. I understand your point about the pictures having connections within the texts and most importantly, the author's message. And I relate to the fact that sometimes the images did not coexist well with the words, making it confusing to relate to the book.
ReplyDelete