The Age of Earthquakes- An introspective look inside the digital world
By Sophia Blasco July 11th, 2018
Hendricks,3A
However, I personally found some flaws that weakened the intentions of the novel. I find that the diction is inconsistent, switching between a formal and casual vernacular. As well, the book ended rather abruptly, as the claim could have been explored more extensively. Another fault is that the text appeals mostly to the modern generation, and could be rather hard to comprehend for older audience members. Also, the bold photography occasionally overshadows the profound nature of the text.
This book evokes multiple questions about society, the internet, maintaining individuality, and how this all is balanced in the modern world. The Age of Earthquakes claims to tell us the answers to the problems presented, but in reality, only time will be able to answer this. However, its claims help bring consciousness and clarity within the sporadic nature of the digital world.
297 words
I thought a lot of the same things you did as I read, but I thought your last paragraph about only time can answer questions and problems is really cool. And your image perfectly fits the theme and style of the book!
ReplyDeleteI agree with you that the book does have some flaws, but it also is showing us a different point of view on something that is used a lot in our day and age. I agree with your point of view on what the book is claiming. I like your photo, it is a novel idea and very creative.
ReplyDeleteI think the fact that the visual aspects of the book were very distracting, however I think this was intentional. To me, it seems as though the authors try to comment on our shrinking attention spans by including overpowering and sometimes unrelated visual content to the background of text, but I found this to be frustrating because the authors never seemed to provide any evidence to back these comments. In terms of your pastiche, I think your idea is very relevant to the modern age and would support the authors points if it were in the book.
ReplyDelete